A bit of that tends to be semi-environmental and race-specific.Or more specifically, their lack of focus on solving bugs that ultimately drive consumers to their competitors.In effect, my bet is the vast majority of time a person chooses a non-Garmin product over a Garmin one is not because Garmin lost the features or price battle.But the reality is that the Garmin bugginess is also true, and everyone knows it.
The sole reason Wahoo has slowly gained market share in cycling GPS computers isnt because they have a technologically more feature laden or better priced product (they dont). Its because they have a product that seemingly has less bugs (and also as everyone points out, because you can configure your data pages via phone app). Its because Suunto spends the time to ensure the vast majority of bugs are never seen by customers. Bluetooth Gps Receiver Model 737 Software Related IssuesBe it hardware or software related issues, the products are just more dependable. Its not about some random bug that Apple, Wahoo, or Polar hasnt yet fixed. Or Suuntos site. Its about the a cultural problem Garmin seems to have around software stability and bugs, that appears to be features first, stability later. Said differently, when I evaluate the steady stream of issues that land at my virtual doorstep via comments, e-mails, tweets, and carrier pigeons, I try and question a few things (no matter the brand). That doesnt mean the company (Garmin or otherwise) is not at fault. Perhaps the product user interface was poorly designed, or perhaps the experience was otherwise ripe for failure. ![]() Im trying to figure out if this is a one-off, which may never be seen again, or is this something thats happening super frequently to a lot of people. For example, I know that while I might see 5-8 cases of a given problem on a Garmin Edge 520 compared to 1-2 instances of a problem on an Wahoo BOLT, I know that unit sales wise, in that scenario the Garmin actually trends better. Thats because if we look at the numbers, Garmin absolutely dominates the marketplace in wearables for sporting events (obviously, Apple dominates overall sales, but were setting that aside from this sportfitness focused site). In a 5KM event youll see higher Apple Watch market share than in a 10KM event, and even less Apple Watches from a marathon. Garmin typically has 10:1 adoption rates compared to Apple in 10KM and above events. And compared to Suunto It ranges between 25:1 upwards to 50:1. Obviously, if we look at total Apple Watch global sales numbers, they easily beat Garmin. But the vast majority of those watches are going on peoples wrists who arent running a mile. Previously Garmin dominated at about 90 of GPS head units on peoples bikes. But in certain events this past fall and spring, Wahoo is coming in at between 15-30.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |